Return to Wildland Fire
Return to Northern Bobwhite site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to Working Lands for Wildlife site
Return to SE Firemap
Return to the Landscape Partnership Literature Gateway Website
return
return to main site

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sections

Personal tools

You are here: Home / Expertise Search / Badash, Joseph
4417 items matching your search terms.
Filter the results.
Item type


























New items since



Sort by relevance · date (newest first) · alphabetically
File PDF document Holwerda Herwig 1986.pdf
Located in Resources / TRB Library / HEA-HOL
File PDF document Homo economicus Evolves
Economic models can benefit from incorporating insights from psychology, but behavior in the lab might be a poor guide to real-world behavior.
Located in Resources / Climate Science Documents
File PDF document Hopkins 1934.pdf
Located in Resources / TRB Library / HOL-HUE
File PDF document Horn Porter 1981.pdf
Located in Resources / TRB Library / HOL-HUE
File PDF document Hornbach 1997.pdf
Located in Resources / TRB Library / HOL-HUE
File PDF document Hornbach et al 1996.pdf
Located in Resources / TRB Library / HOL-HUE
File PDF document Horne McIntosh 1979.pdf
Located in Resources / TRB Library / HOL-HUE
File PDF document Host Fish American Midland Naturalist.pdf
Located in Resources / TRB Library / YOK-Z
File PDF document Hot climates, high sensitivity
Concluding paragraph: One sure solution to the problem posed by uncertainty of climate sensitivity in hot climates is simply not to go there. Unfortunately, it looks increasingly like Nature will step in to answer some of our questions for us, and I doubt we’ll like the answer. The highest emission scenario currently being considered by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 (8), which would bring CO2 concentrations up to 2,000 ppm, which is in the upper reaches of the range considered in ref. 2. Even this scenario can be considered somewhat optimistic, in that it assumes that the annual growth in CO emissions rate (which has been hovering around 3% for decades) will tail off by 2060 and that the emissions rate will cease growing altogether by 2100, whereafter emissions will trend to zero; unrestrained growth could eas- ily dump twice as much carbon into the atmosphere. It is not known if there are actually enough recoverable fossil fuels to emit that much CO2. Hoping that we run out of fossil fuels before bringing on a climate catastrophe does not seem like sound climate policy, but at present it seems to be the only one we have.
Located in Resources / Climate Science Documents
File PDF document Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value
Protected areas are crucial for biodiversity conservation because they provide safe havens for species threatened by land-use change and resulting habitat loss. However, protected areas are only effective when they stop habitat loss within their boundaries, and are connected via corridors to other wild areas. The effectiveness of protected areas is threatened by development; however, the extent of this threat is unknown. We compiled spatially-detailed housing growth data from 1940 to 2030, and quantified growth for each wilderness area, national park, and national forest in the contermi- nous United States. Our findings show that housing development in the United States may severely limit the ability of protected areas to function as a modern “Noah’s Ark.” Between 1940 and 2000, 28 mil- lion housing units were built within 50 km of protected areas, and 940,000 were built within national forests. Housing growth rates during the 1990s within 1 km of protected areas (20% per decade) outpaced the national average (13%). If long-term trends continue, another 17 million housing units will be built within 50 km of pro- tected areas by 2030 (1 million within 1 km), greatly diminishing their conservation value. US protected areas are increasingly iso- lated, housing development in their surroundings is decreasing their effective size, and national forests are even threatened by habitat loss within their administrative boundaries. Protected areas in the United States are thus threatened similarly to those in developing countries. However, housing growth poses the main threat to protected areas in the United States whereas deforestation is the main threat in developing countries. conservation threats | effectiveness | parks | reserves
Located in Resources / Climate Science Documents